SCAAC

Surviving College as a Conservative

  • If you’re giving away money…

  • Account Stuff

  • Twitter

  • Top Posts

  • Recent Comments

    guffyconservative on Three Arguments Against Concea…
    stewart pidasso on Three Arguments Against Concea…
    Anna F on 4 Misconceptions Concerning An…
    Sam Hindu's Blog. on Obama Page Update/Selma March…
    guffyconservative on IMAO Conservative Solutions to…
  •  

    May 2012
    S M T W T F S
    « Mar    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Post Categories

Archive for the ‘Rush Limbaugh’ Category

Other Documents – The Americans Who Risked Everything By Rush Limbaugh, Jr.

Posted by guffyconservative on 07/21/2010

(here) (The Declaration)


“Our Lives, Our Fortunes, Our Sacred Honor”

It was a glorious morning. The sun was shining and the wind was from the southeast. Up especially early, a tall bony, redheaded young Virginian found time to buy a new thermometer, for which he paid three pounds, fifteen shillings. He also bought gloves for Martha, his wife, who was ill at home.

Thomas Jefferson arrived early at the statehouse. The temperature was 72.5 degrees and the horseflies weren’t nearly so bad at that hour. It was a lovely room, very large, with gleaming white walls. The chairs were comfortable. Facing the single door were two brass fireplaces, but they would not be used today.

The moment the door was shut, and it was always kept locked, the room became an oven. The tall windows were shut, so that loud quarreling voices could not be heard by passersby. Small openings atop the windows allowed a slight stir of air, and also a large number of horseflies. Jefferson records that “the horseflies were dexterous in finding necks, and the silk of stockings was nothing to them.” All discussing was punctuated by the slap of hands on necks.

On the wall at the back, facing the president’s desk, was a panoply — consisting of a drum, swords, and banners seized from Fort Ticonderoga the previous year. Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold had captured the place, shouting that they were taking it “in the name of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress!”

Now Congress got to work, promptly taking up an emergency measure about which there was discussion but no dissension. “Resolved: That an application be made to the Committee of Safety of Pennsylvania for a supply of flints for the troops at New York.”

Then Congress transformed itself into a committee of the whole. The Declaration of Independence was read aloud once more, and debate resumed. Though Jefferson was the best writer of all of them, he had been somewhat verbose. Congress hacked the excess away. They did a good job, as a side-by-side comparison of the rough draft and the final text shows. They cut the phrase “by a self-assumed power.” “Climb” was replaced by “must read,” then “must” was eliminated, then the whole sentence, and soon the whole paragraph was cut. Jefferson groaned as they continued what he later called “their depredations.” “Inherent and inalienable rights” came out “certain unalienable rights,” and to this day no one knows who suggested the elegant change.

A total of 86 alterations were made. Almost 500 words were eliminated, leaving 1,337. At last, after three days of wrangling, the document was put to a vote.

Here in this hall Patrick Henry had once thundered: “I am no longer a Virginian, sir, but an American.” But today the loud, sometimes bitter argument stilled, and without fanfare the vote was taken from north to south by colonies, as was the custom. On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was adopted.

There were no trumpets blown. No one stood on his chair and cheered. The afternoon was waning and Congress had no thought of delaying the full calendar of routine business on its hands. For several hours they worked on many other problems before adjourning for the day.

Much To Lose

What kind of men were the 56 signers who adopted the Declaration of Independence and who, by their signing, committed an act of treason against the crown? To each of you, the names Franklin, Adams, Hancock and Jefferson are almost as familiar as household words. Most of us, however, know nothing of the other signers. Who were they? What happened to them?

I imagine that many of you are somewhat surprised at the names not there: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Patrick Henry. All were elsewhere.

Ben Franklin was the only really old man. Eighteen were under 40; three were in their 20s. Of the 56 almost half – 24 – were judges and lawyers. Eleven were merchants, nine were landowners and farmers, and the remaining 12 were doctors, ministers, and politicians.

With only a few exceptions, such as Samuel Adams of Massachusetts, these were men of substantial property. All but two had families. The vast majority were men of education and standing in their communities. They had economic security as few men had in the 18th Century.

Each had more to lose from revolution than he had to gain by it. John Hancock, one of the richest men in America, already had a price of 500 pounds on his head. He signed in enormous letters so that his Majesty could now read his name without glasses and could now double the reward. Ben Franklin wryly noted: “Indeed we must all hang together, otherwise we shall most assuredly hang separately.”

Fat Benjamin Harrison of Virginia told tiny Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: “With me it will all be over in a minute, but you, you will be dancing on air an hour after I am gone.”

These men knew what they risked. The penalty for treason was death by hanging. And remember, a great British fleet was already at anchor in New York Harbor.

They were sober men. There were no dreamy-eyed intellectuals or draft card burners here. They were far from hot-eyed fanatics yammering for an explosion. They simply asked for the status quo. It was change they resisted. It was equality with the mother country they desired. It was taxation with representation they sought. They were all conservatives, yet they rebelled.

It was principle, not property, that had brought these men to Philadelphia. Two of them became presidents of the United States. Seven of them became state governors. One died in office as vice president of the United States. Several would go on to be U.S. Senators. One, the richest man in America, in 1828 founded the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. One, a delegate from Philadelphia, was the only real poet, musician and philosopher of the signers. (It was he, Francis Hopkinson not Betsy Ross who designed the United States flag.)

Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, had introduced the resolution to adopt the Declaration of Independence in June of 1776. He was prophetic in his concluding remarks: “Why then sir, why do we longer delay? Why still deliberate? Let this happy day give birth to an American Republic. Let her arise not to devastate and to conquer but to reestablish the reign of peace and law.

“The eyes of Europe are fixed upon us. She demands of us a living example of freedom that may exhibit a contrast in the felicity of the citizen to the ever-increasing tyranny which desolates her polluted shores. She invites us to prepare an asylum where the unhappy may find solace, and the persecuted repost.

“If we are not this day wanting in our duty, the names of the American Legislatures of 1776 will be placed by posterity at the side of all of those whose memory has been and ever will be dear to virtuous men and good citizens.”

Though the resolution was formally adopted July 4, it was not until July 8 that two of the states authorized their delegates to sign, and it was not until August 2 that the signers met at Philadelphia to actually put their names to the Declaration.

William Ellery, delegate from Rhode Island, was curious to see the signers’ faces as they committed this supreme act of personal courage. He saw some men sign quickly, “but in no face was he able to discern real fear.” Stephan Hopkins, Ellery’s colleague from Rhode Island, was a man past 60. As he signed with a shaking pen, he declared: “My hand trembles, but my heart does not.”

“Most Glorious Service”

Even before the list was published, the British marked down every member of Congress suspected of having put his name to treason. All of them became the objects of vicious manhunts. Some were taken. Some, like Jefferson, had narrow escapes. All who had property or families near British strongholds suffered.

· Francis Lewis, New York delegate saw his home plundered — and his estates in what is now Harlem — completely destroyed by British Soldiers. Mrs. Lewis was captured and treated with great brutality. Though she was later exchanged for two British prisoners through the efforts of Congress, she died from the effects of her abuse.

· William Floyd, another New York delegate, was able to escape with his wife and children across Long Island Sound to Connecticut, where they lived as refugees without income for seven years. When they came home they found a devastated ruin.

· Philips Livingstone had all his great holdings in New York confiscated and his family driven out of their home. Livingstone died in 1778 still working in Congress for the cause.

· Louis Morris, the fourth New York delegate, saw all his timber, crops, and livestock taken. For seven years he was barred from his home and family.

· John Hart of Trenton, New Jersey, risked his life to return home to see his dying wife. Hessian soldiers rode after him, and he escaped in the woods. While his wife lay on her deathbed, the soldiers ruined his farm and wrecked his homestead. Hart, 65, slept in caves and woods as he was hunted across the countryside. When at long last, emaciated by hardship, he was able to sneak home, he found his wife had already been buried, and his 13 children taken away. He never saw them again. He died a broken man in 1779, without ever finding his family.

· Dr. John Witherspoon, signer, was president of the College of New Jersey, later called Princeton. The British occupied the town of Princeton, and billeted troops in the college. They trampled and burned the finest college library in the country.

· Judge Richard Stockton, another New Jersey delegate signer, had rushed back to his estate in an effort to evacuate his wife and children. The family found refuge with friends, but a Tory sympathizer betrayed them. Judge Stockton was pulled from bed in the night and brutally beaten by the arresting soldiers. Thrown into a common jail, he was deliberately starved. Congress finally arranged for Stockton’s parole, but his health was ruined. The judge was released as an invalid, when he could no longer harm the British cause. He returned home to find his estate looted and did not live to see the triumph of the Revolution. His family was forced to live off charity.

· Robert Morris, merchant prince of Philadelphia, delegate and signer, met Washington’s appeals and pleas for money year after year. He made and raised arms and provisions which made it possible for Washington to cross the Delaware at Trenton. In the process he lost 150 ships at sea, bleeding his own fortune and credit almost dry.

· George Clymer, Pennsylvania signer, escaped with his family from their home, but their property was completely destroyed by the British in the Germantown and Brandywine campaigns.

· Dr. Benjamin Rush, also from Pennsylvania, was forced to flee to Maryland. As a heroic surgeon with the army, Rush had several narrow escapes.

· John Martin, a Tory in his views previous to the debate, lived in a strongly loyalist area of Pennsylvania. When he came out for independence, most of his neighbors and even some of his relatives ostracized him. He was a sensitive and troubled man, and many believed this action killed him. When he died in 1777, his last words to his tormentors were: “Tell them that they will live to see the hour when they shall acknowledge it [the signing] to have been the most glorious service that I have ever rendered to my country.”

· William Ellery, Rhode Island delegate, saw his property and home burned to the ground.

· Thomas Lynch, Jr., South Carolina delegate, had his health broken from privation and exposures while serving as a company commander in the military. His doctors ordered him to seek a cure in the West Indies and on the voyage, he and his young bride were drowned at sea.

· Edward Rutledge, Arthur Middleton, and Thomas Heyward, Jr., the other three South Carolina signers, were taken by the British in the siege of Charleston. They were carried as prisoners of war to St. Augustine, Florida, where they were singled out for indignities. They were exchanged at the end of the war, the British in the meantime having completely devastated their large landholdings and estates.

· Thomas Nelson, signer of Virginia, was at the front in command of the Virginia military forces. With British General Charles Cornwallis in Yorktown, fire from 70 heavy American guns began to destroy Yorktown piece by piece. Lord Cornwallis and his staff moved their headquarters into Nelson’s palatial home. While American cannonballs were making a shambles of the town, the house of Governor Nelson remained untouched. Nelson turned in rage to the American gunners and asked, “Why do you spare my home?” They replied, “Sir, out of respect to you.” Nelson cried, “Give me the cannon!” and fired on his magnificent home himself, smashing it to bits. But Nelson’s sacrifice was not quite over. He had raised $2 million for the Revolutionary cause by pledging his own estates. When the loans came due, a newer peacetime Congress refused to honor them, and Nelson’s property was forfeited. He was never reimbursed. He died, impoverished, a few years later at the age of 50.

Lives, Fortunes, Honor

Of those 56 who signed the Declaration of Independence, nine died of wounds or hardships during the war. Five were captured and imprisoned, in each case with brutal treatment. Several lost wives, sons or entire families. One lost his 13 children. Two wives were brutally treated. All were at one time or another the victims of manhunts and driven from their homes. Twelve signers had their homes completely burned. Seventeen lost everything they owned. Yet not one defected or went back on his pledged word. Their honor, and the nation they sacrificed so much to create is still intact.

And, finally, there is the New Jersey signer, Abraham Clark.

He gave two sons to the officer corps in the Revolutionary Army. They were captured and sent to that infamous British prison hulk afloat in New York Harbor known as the hell ship Jersey, where 11,000 American captives were to die. The younger Clarks were treated with a special brutality because of their father. One was put in solitary and given no food. With the end almost in sight, with the war almost won, no one could have blamed Abraham Clark for acceding to the British request when they offered him his sons’ lives if he would recant and come out for the King and Parliament. The utter despair in this man’s heart, the anguish in his very soul, must reach out to each one of us down through 200 years with his answer: “No.”

The 56 signers of the Declaration Of Independence proved by their every deed that they made no idle boast when they composed the most magnificent curtain line in history. “And for the support of this Declaration with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”

My friends, I know you have a copy of the Declaration of Independence somewhere around the house – in an old history book (newer ones may well omit it), an encyclopedia, or one of those artificially aged “parchments” we all got in school years ago. I suggest that each of you take the time this month to read through the text of the Declaration, one of the most noble and beautiful political documents in human history.

There is no more profound sentence than this: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness…”

These are far more than mere poetic words. The underlying ideas that infuse every sentence of this treatise have sustained this nation for more than two centuries. They were forged in the crucible of great sacrifice. They are living words that spring from and satisfy the deepest cries for liberty in the human spirit.

“Sacred honor” isn’t a phrase we use much these days, but every American life is touched by the bounty of this, the Founders’ legacy. It is freedom, tested by blood, and watered with tears.

Posted in Other Documents, Rush Limbaugh, SCAAC | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Bo Snerdley: Official EIB Obama Criticizer

Posted by guffyconservative on 10/21/2009

I’m not sure what day this is from, but I ran across this Rush Limbaugh Show excerpt on Twitter. Warning! There is some language (mostly B and A).

The official transcript is here. I’ve reproduced it below (with censors):

RUSH: Now, ladies and gentlemen, the Official Obama Criticizer, Bo Snerdley, asked me yesterday if he could enter this fray.  His theory is that he is Certified Black Enough to legitimately and without criticism criticize Obama.  And he would like to say some words about this NFL episode.  So without any further delay, here is Mr. Bo Snerdley, the Official Obama Criticizer here on the EIB Network.

SNERDLEY: This is Bo Snerdley, Official Obama Criticizer for the  EIB Network.  Certified Black Enough to criticize with 100% organic slave blood.  Today, Obama isn’t the issue.  This is the special sports edition.  And I have a statement: “My fellow Americans, this week, a racial spectacle has been played out which is nothing less than disgraceful.”  You know what? Screw this!  We’re going to the translation right now, only this time it’s not a translation for the EIB brothers and sisters in the ‘hood, it’s a translation to the ‘hood.  Yo, my fellow homeys, especially those of you who play in the NFL: Every single one of you who shouted out against Rush, check yourself, dog.  You got played, okay?  Rush ain’t your problem, yo.  He never was your problem.  He never will be your problem.  Twenty years, man! For 20 years Rush has been telling everybody: You brothers in the NFL deserve to get paid.

The NFL and every other sports league there is got a break it off to you because you the best, right?  The owners they got to break it off to you, give up your props, give you your props.  Any of you fools know that, yo?  No.  Instead you get all puffed up behind some Obama flackie, jump on TV, start mouthing off about “Rush said this! Rush said that! Slavery this, slavery that,” whatever, whatever. It was all made up, yo! Some of these clown reporters on TV who fed all the stuff to you, yo, you know what they doing now?  They are out here trying to apologize quietly so they don’t get their [edit] sued, yo!  Check that out.  Y’all got played.  So here’s your question for you brothers, especially some of y’all in the NFL. Y’all going to man up? Y’all going to man and up say, “Hey, we got played man. We kinda sorry. Oops, we didn’t know.”

Okay, now, let me — while I’m — yo, let me get this off, okay?  McNabb.  Can we just do this one more time?  Square up.  Even if Rush said what y’all thought he said, which he didn’t say, what’s the biggie?  Y’all thought he said that McNabb wasn’t all that and was getting props because people wanted a black guy to succeed at quarterback.  So what?  So what?  Don’t y’all want to see a black quarterback make it, yo?  I do.  So the sports media guys, he said they want him to succeed, what’s the big deal?  Is there a problem here, yo?  And McNabb? You a punk, yo.  Now, my NFL brothers, let me ask you a question here.  Who was it that whipped Michael Vick a new one after he got done in the joint?

Was it Rush?  Nope.  It was a bunch of your white liberal sportswriter guys pretending they loved their dogs more than they loved their wives, okay?  That’s who ripped all over Michael Vick.  Who’s been ripping Plaxico, who’s been ripping Pacman?  Every time y’all get going… Who was it that ran T.O. on up out of Dallas, yo?  Okay, was it Rush?  No.  Okay?  Now for all of you homeys, this is outside the NFL. For all my brothers and sisters, y’all want to get [edit] off about somebody insulting black people? Why don’t y’all watch BET, Black “Exploitation” Television, okay?  You want to know who’s calling black women, “[edit]“?  Is it Rush Limbaugh?  No.  Who’s telling y’all that all you can do is jiggle your butts on TV?  Is it Rush Limbaugh?  Rush ain’t your enemy, yo.  You know what the biggest threat to black men is in America, yo?

It ain’t Rush Limbaugh.  It’s other black men who are killing off brothers like they did that young boy out in Chicago, okay?  A quarter of our brothers don’t even make it to be age 25 ’cause they get shot up by other black men.  Is Rush out there pulling the trigger?  No.  And y’all brothers, you got anything to say about it?  Especially y’all in the NFL.  Y’all get paid, y’all leave the hood, that’s that. Not a word. Okay?  Now, for all of y’all who live deep in the hood, I got another question: Is it Rush Limbaugh stopping your kids from being educated in your run-down schools, in your run-down-[edit] neighborhoods?  No.  Who is it?  And where’s Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson on that instead of flapping their mouth about all this other stuff that they don’t know anything else about?  How come Al, Jesse, and y’all are living large and the ‘hood is still the ‘hood?  That concludes my statement.

RUSH: That’s the Official Obama Criticizer, Bo Snerdley.

Epic, right?

Posted in Rush Limbaugh | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Why People Hate Barack Obama?

Posted by guffyconservative on 10/20/2009

Why People Hate Barack Obama? (Harvey):

“He has big, flapping, sticky-out chimp ears, but I’m not allowed to CALL them “chimp” ears, because that’s [mocking, high-pitched voice] ‘raaaacist!‘”

“For the same reason I hated Bill Clinton – he married a bitter, shrewish harridan who is unencumbered by even a tincture of fashion sense.”

“His communications director can call Mao a ‘political philosopher’ with a straight face.”

“I just can’t forgive Obama for saying that slavery had its merits. I mean, I understand he was speaking off the cuff and was just trying to make a larger point and everyone gaffes once in a while, but [edit]… there IS a line, dude.” For the record, this is a play on the fake Limbaugh quotes. Obama did not actually say this, so calm down and take a chill pill if you’re a liberal. If you’re a conservative, you can quit the laughing just a tad. On second thought, don’t.

“He’s a [censored] socialist.”

Why Do I Hate Obama? (Frank J.):

“He’s always playing his loud music late at night.”

“He eats babies.”

“He’s always mixing up ‘imply’ and ‘infer’.”

“There’s strong suspicion he’s a serial killer.”

“His voice is kinda nasally.”

“He doesn’t even try to hide his worship of Satan.”

“He smothers his hot dog in ketchup.”

“His favorite pastime is lighting orphanages on fire and laughing.”

“He uses the wrong fork for his salad.”

“He once tried to poison a reservoir with nerve toxin just to distract Batman.”

“He’s a Democrat.”

For the record, I, Guffy Conservative, do not hate Obama (per the “love your enemies” and other verses in the Bible). But I do hate his policies.

Also, all of Frank J.’s above quotes are guaranteed to be as fact-based as Rush Limbaugh racist “quotes.”

Posted in Favorite Quotes, Frank J., Harvey, Humor, IMAO, Obama, Presidents, Ridicule, Rush Limbaugh | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Top Ten Racist Limbaugh Quotes

Posted by guffyconservative on 10/19/2009

The following is almost too funny to be true:

It has come to my attention that at least one person came to my blog via this Top Ten Racist Limbaugh Quotes article. I have decided to engage each quote individually.

Note that the author thinks he did his fact-checking very well. He gave his source for each quote:

I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.

I am in no way defending this statement. He’s right to an infetismal degree. I mean, Hitler killing Jews had the “merit” of helping with overpopulation, but that doesn’t make it good in the least. This statement is stupid and racist (beyond the slavery thing – I’m talking about that last sentence).

But that’s besides the point. Click on the link. If you read the page it takes you to, it turns out Rush did not say this. A guy who allegedly listens to Rush said this, a man by the name of Michael Ledeen.

You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed.

Same as above. Michael Ledeen said this. Rush Limbaugh did not.

Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?

I don’t know much about Jesse Jackson, but I do know he’s black and he’s liberal. Did it occur to anyone that this might be something against Jesse Jackson as a person and not because of his race?! Don’t bring race into the picture unless the quote-ee does! If a quote doesn’t have “black”, “African American”, one of the derogatory “black” terms, “slavery”, or something similar, there’s a good chance it’s not about race.

Right. So you go into Darfur and you go into South Africa, you get rid of the white government there. You put sanctions on them. You stand behind Nelson Mandela — who was bankrolled by communists for a time, had the support of certain communist leaders. You go to Ethiopia. You do the same thing.

First of all, at the beginning of all this, the author claimed the websites used were “reputable.” I read a little from this blog, and the author of the source for this link thinks ALL Republicans inheritly hate and fear black people. I’m sorry, sir, but I’m a Republican with black friends who knows black Republicans who don’t hate or fear themselves and who voted for one.

That aside, the quote appears accurate. But let’s look at the context:

LIMBAUGH: There are two reasons. What color is the skin of the people in Darfur?

CALLER: Uh, yeah.

LIMBAUGH:
It’s black. And who do the Democrats really need to keep voting for them? If they lose a significant percentage of this voting bloc, they’re in trouble.

CALLER: Yes. Yes. The black population.

LIMBAUGH: Right. So you go into Darfur and you go into South Africa, you get rid of the white government there. You put sanctions on them. You stand behind Nelson Mandela — who was bankrolled by communists for a time, had the support of certain communist leaders. You go to Ethiopia. You do the same thing.

Limbaugh’s not supporting the white government. And he’s not even hating on the black governed. He’s pointing out that the Democrats rely on black support and that their motivation for doing these things is cementing black support – and that they’re willing to ally with communists to do it. This statement is not in the least for or against blacks. It’s against the Democrat Party, who he is saying use race to maintain their base.

Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.

Again, this is hardly a “reputable” site. The guy obviously hates Rush. I’m beginning to think the author of this “Top Ten” article defines “reputable” as “leftist,” as opposed to “objective.”

Anyway, the quote is indeed accurate (or at least, Rush didn’t deny it). But, basically, what he said concerning the quote boils down to this: he was referring to the Bloods and Crips as gangs, not as violent black men. He said, and is right, that he probably could’ve/should’ve used a better illustration, but think about this for a second. Suppose you want to say the NFL looks like a fight between to rival gangs. The Bloods and Crips are the most famous of any American gangs. Of course he picked them. Even I, a lower-middle-class geek with no criminal record whatsoever, know who they are. In fact, I only know of one other gang; that Hispanic gang, M-something. And, of course, if he’d used that gang it would’ve been construed as racist also.

He was talking about the behavior of the players, not the color of their skin. Specifically, he was referring to when one Chargers player essentially rubbed a would-be defeat in a Patriot’s face and the Ref flagged him for it. Rush sided with the Ref, saying that stuff like that makes it look like “a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons.” Indeed, sometimes it does. I don’t notice it in the NFL any more than I notice it in any other sport (and certainly less than in Hockey), but it does. And don’t forget that football is Rush’s sport, so it makes sense that it would be about football that he’d make this comment.

Just one final note: the site where I found a recording of Rush talking about that comment said that he cited no evidence. First of all, what evidence can you cite to prove what you meant by something? Second, he kind of did. He referred to a NFL player going on some news network and agreeing with Rush!

The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies.

I could not find confirmation of this quote. So, I don’t know if Rush said it or not or, if he did, what he meant by it. But I know enough about Rush and the NAACP to make a highly educated guess that, as always, this a specifically targeted attack, targeting the NAACP, whom Rush has a big problem with, not African Americans, whom Rush does not have a problem with. Rush has quite a history of not liking the NAACP. I’m no more familiar with the organization than anyone else, so I can neither agree nor disagree with his views, but I’ll state the essence of them. He thinks the NAACP is another group that is, at the least, not helping black people and, at the worst, hurting them. It supports leftist blacks but not rightist blacks. It is highly politicized.

Again, these are Rush’s views, not mine. I do not know where this quote came from, or what the context is, but I do know enough about Rush to say that this comment is about – and is only about – the NAACP, and not black people in general.

They’re 12 percent of the population. Who the [heck] cares?

Again, hardly a “reputable” site. I’ve found nothing that I’m certain is false here, but why isn’t the author citing places like The Rush Limbaugh Show transcripts or YouTube videos of Rush’s show? Why is he citing these anti-Rush articles? He’s writing an anti-Rush article, who the heck cares what his sources are beyond accuracy? Whoever the author is, anti-Rush sources only make your article appear biased and, when coupled with your first two quotes, made-up. Cite some more concrete places next time, so I don’t have to find them for you.

What I can say is that, in response to this “quote,” the author said “even George Bush wouldn’t admit to that.”

“wouldn’t admit to that”? Really? So you think George Bush is a racist?! What are you, afraid of all white conservatives? We’re talking the same George Bush who appointed Condoleza (someone correct my spelling) Rice. The guy who Colin Powell worked for. I went through Bush’s cabinet and found that four of his cabinet members were black. At one time or another, thirty-two men and women were in his cabinet. That means 12.5% of Bush’s cabinet appointees were black. That seems perfectly fair in a country with a roughly 12% black population. He also had other minorities.

I was unable to find a concrete source for this one either. For quotes 3-5, I was able to find transcripts or video/audio files. Since quote 5, the only thing I’ve been able to find is sites saying Rush said these things. Until I know he said them, and until I know the context, I can’t really say anything but that this author, and the hundreds of others out there, really ought to give more concrete evidence if they want to be taken seriously. Notice things like my “Obama gaffes” page. I don’t just say Obama said stuff – I find videos of what he said. You all should provide my favorite radio host the same respect and honest treatment I afford your liberal champion.

Take that bone out of your nose and call me back.

This quote is some thirty years old. Rush was working under the pseudonym Jeff Christie at the time. I’m pretty sure this quote is accurate but, again, I was unable to find any context (other than the repeated fact that the caller was black). Please, someone send me a link or recording or transcript or something.

I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well.  They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well.  I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve.

Ah, the infamous McNabb quote. I happen to know this quote is accurate, and I also happen to know the context. Just as with the NAACP quote, Rush is criticizing the media here. He’s not really even criticizing McNabb. Let’s say some extreme Rush fan called him the Christ. I’d be on that guy before you could say “weblog.” I’d attack the falsehood of that statement. But I would in no way be criticizing Rush. I’d be criticizing the fan. In this quote, Rush never wishes ill on the blacks. He is confronting his lifelong enemy, the mainstream media.

Limbaugh attacks on Obama. Limbaugh has called Obama a ‘halfrican American’ has said that Obama was not black but Arab because Kenya is an Arab region, even though Arabs are less than one percent of Kenya. Since mainstream America has become more accepting of African-Americans, Limbaugh has decided to play against its new racial fears, Arabs and Muslims. Despite the fact Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law school, Limbaugh has called him an ‘affirmative action candidate.’ Limbaugh even has repeatedly played a song on his radio show ‘Barack the Magic Negro’ using an antiquated Jim Crow era term for black a man who many Americans are supporting for president. Way to go Rush.

Most Limbaugh attacks on Obama are purely based in politics. Let’s get that straight.

I don’t see how the “halfrican American” thing would, if true, be racist. In fact, if a racist said that, wouldn’t it be a compliment? Would any anti-black racist bring up the fact that Obama’s half-white? This seems to me greater evidence that Rush is not racist than it is that he is.

I’ll bet that comment about him being Arab is either false or taken out of context. Even if it isn’t, the author is again jumping the racism gun. He’s not playing against racial fears “Arabs and Muslims.” For one thing, Muslims aren’t a race. That’s a religion, genius. Second, if Rush called him an Arab, he was probably trying to make the Muslim connection. Again, not racist. Maybe it’s wrong. Certainly, Obama’s no Arab. And maybe Rush is erroneous in making this statement, but it’s not racist to make some flimsy connection between Obama and Islam. After all, his father was a Muslim.

I don’t get how Obama being magna cum laude and an “affirmative action candidate” are mutually exclusive. I was unaware that intelligence was a factor in affirmative action. I thought it had only to do with race and financial means. Maybe the author should elaborate. For the record, I don’t think Obama would be an “affirmative action candidate.” Also, I would like some kind of source for that “quote.”

And the song “Barack the Magic Negro” is not racist, either. As a matter of fact, the song isn’t even anti-Obama per se. It’s actually targeted more at white people who allegedly voted for Obama out of “guilt.” And for the record, I don’t even like the song.

In summary, Mr. Author, check your facts. Give context. Use actual sources besides other folks like you. And look into the background (i.e. listen to the “Barack…Negro” song; don’t just see the name and yell “RACISM!”) before making accusations.

P.S. If anyone wants to know the sources I used for this stuff (my own, not those he gave), just shoot me an email or leave a comment below. I just feel to tired at the moment to deal with all the copying and pasting and googling.

Posted in African Americans & The Democrats, Rush Limbaugh | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Limbaugh & The NFL

Posted by guffyconservative on 10/15/2009

In relatively apolitical news, Rush Limbaugh is one of a group of people trying to buy the St. Louis Rams. A whole lot of people are having a fit over this. Many have called Limbaugh a racist, citing quotes that he simply didn’t say. Some have said that many black NFL players will boycott if Limbaugh buys the Rams. That’s just nonsense. Does anyone honestly think a bunch of dudes who have devoted their lives to football are going to boycott very lucrative deals because they think the owner might be racist? And if he is racist, wouldn’t that be exactly what he would want?

Limbaugh made another point. Why would a racist buy an NFL team? He cited some statistic that I’m not sure of and can’t remember correctly, but more than half of NFL players are black, apparently. Some have brought back his Barack the Magic Negro song as “proof” that Rush is racist. I don’t care for the song personally, but it’s hardly racist.

Go ahead and Google it. You can see why someone who just sees the title or listens to one or two lines might think it’s racist, but come on! The views parodied in the song are the views that were, at the time, expressed by a black man (Al Sharpton). And while I could argue that the specific reasons for using the term “Barack the Magic Negro” is not racist, it’s not necessary. The line comes from a newspaper, not from Rush himself.

So if he’s got the money and is willing to part with it, let him. And shame on whoever leaked that information – you just broke your word for the sake of eliminating competition.

Posted in Obama, Presidents, Ridicule, Rush Limbaugh, Rush's Humor | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Banking Queen

Posted by guffyconservative on 10/14/2009

This one was actually from a while ago, but I didn’t hear it when it first aired. Rush aired it again on Monday (the 12th), although he speaks over the intro.

Also, just a side note: I’ve renamed Glory, Glory Hallelujah to Gore & Clinton Couldn’t Fool Ya. It’s the first title I thought up that made sense and I don’t know what Rush’s title for it is.

Featuring Barney Frank as the Banking Queen: (sorry about the verses, Banking Queen follows the Dancing Queen format loosely)

Oooooooooooooooooh.

Oooooooooooooooooh.

You can build – you can buy – any house your heart desires.

Oooh, zero down. Financing. I am the banking queen.

Friday night and your cash is low.

I know a place that you can go.

Oh, get your house and use it. Go ahead, abuse it.

You can do anything.

Go out and have a fling.

I am the banking queen.

Old and sweet didn’t do a thing.

Banking queen.

Don’t complain or you’ll hear me scream. Oh, yeah.

You can build – you can buy – any house your heart desires.

Oooh, zero down. Financing. I am the banking queen.

Told the bankers, “Hey, you guys

Make the loans or it’s your behind.

My friends at Fannie sure need it.

Do it my way or beat it.”

Why are the stocks crashing?

That doesn’t mean a thing.

I’m still the banking queen.

Never spanked for a single thing.

Banking queen.

Don’t complain or you’ll hear me scream. Oh, yeah.

You can build,

You can buy

Any house your heart desires.

Oooh, zero down.

Financing.

I am the banking queen.

Oooooooooooooooooh.

I am the banking queen.

Oooooooooooooooooh.

Posted in Humor, Music, Parodies, Parody, Rush Limbaugh, Rush's Humor | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

For the Sake of the Environment, Use the Bathroom!

Posted by guffyconservative on 10/09/2009

Try not to laugh.

I was listening to The Rush Limbaugh Show from Wednesday (I record the show while at school/work and usually listen the next day). Fourteen minutes into the show, he mentions that a Japanese airline is requiring passengers to use the bathroom prior to takeoff in order to reduce weight on the plane, thereby reducing carbon emissions. I looked it up on Google, and here’s the article I found. According to this, Rush was a little off – it’s not a requirement, but they are definitely requesting that customers use the commode.

Anyway, the whole argument is that going to the bathroom will reduce carbon emissions by reducing the weight the plane transports. Let’s table the whole environment issue for the moment and assume that the world is, indeed, being negatively affected by carbon emissions and oil use and that the ice caps are melting and we’re all going to die and all that stuff. Assuming that’s all true, how much will this help? I decided to run some numbers on how much it would actually do. First, I tried to find out what kind of planes ANA uses, but I couldn’t. For my calculations, I found a list of passenger airplanes used by Air Charter International and picked the first plane in the list, the A300-600R. I also made the following assumptions:

  • the plane is fully used (all seats filled)
  • each person weighs 130 pounds
  • a bathroom trip relieves a person of 5 pounds of weight (arbitrary number, keep in mind that many passengers won’t even feel the biological need to go to the bathroom, and will only be going because of the “environment” thing)
  • each of the 393 passengers carries 10 pounds of carry-on (the limit is 22) and checks 80 pounds of luggage (the limit is 100 – more for business-class passengers)

The A300-600R weighs 200,400 pounds when empty. When fully loaded (we’ll add a crew of 52 – totally arbitrary number), there are 445 people weighing 130 pounds, 393 of whom bring an additional 90 pounds of luggage. The total weight is 200,400 + 445*130 + 393*90 = 293,620 pounds. Assuming that each of the 445 uses the bathroom, that is 2,250 pounds less that the airplane is transporting. That means there is a total of 225000/293620 = 0.77% reduction in required energy.

That roughly equates to a 0.77% reduction in carbon emissions. Keeping in mind that this number is very high (the average person’s weight was low, the average luggage-per-person was probably low, and so on), that’s a ridiculously tiny amount that will be saved. Add to this the fact that this whole thing is merely a suggestion (meaning that many – if not most – passengers won’t comply) and the fact that ANA isn’t exactly the largest airline, with half the number of passengers as the largest airline – Southwest Airlines, and the whole effect becomes negligible.

This whole “green” thing got ridiculous a long time ago. To me, it’s not much more than a joke now. A running joke, but still a joke.

Rush then had an idea – the paint used on the aircraft probably weighed more. I tried running the numbers for this – way too many approximations. But I’ll bet there’s some merit to the idea.

Anyway, I was talking about this story with my roommate, and he jokingly commented that perhaps they might only want to encourage using the bathroom on Japan-bound flights. That way, the “carbon emissions” that you emit in the bathroom would be emitted outside Japan, making Japan look “better” compared to other countries in terms of environmentalism.

Posted in "Climate Change", Rush Limbaugh | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Spin-off of “Obama Kids” song

Posted by guffyconservative on 10/08/2009

This is a parody from The Rush Limbaugh Show on October Fifth. Before any liberal or moderate Rush-haters start jumping all over this, I’d like to remind you of the context. Yes, the song seems like a big example of supreme arrogance, but it’s made in light of and reaction to the sickening song about Obama being taught to schoolchildren.

To the tune of Glory, Glory, Hallelujah:

Rush Hudson Limbaugh

Mmm, Mmm, Mmm

Rush Hudson Limbaugh

Mmm, Mmm, Mmm

.

My ears have heard Rush Limbaugh on my parents’ radio.

He tells me that the Left is wrong and stuff I need to know.

We turn it off when he is done ’cause there’s no other show.

Rush, keep broadcasting on!

.

Glory, glory, hallelujah!

Gore and Clinton couldn’t fool ya.

Barack Obama can’t ignore ya.

Rush, keep broadcasting on!

.

In 1951, he was born in Missouri.

Now, he’s on the radio conducting EIB

on the air to set us free

from sea to shining sea.

He keeps broadcasting on!

.

Glory, glory, hallelujah!

Gore and Clinton couldn’t fool ya.

Barack Obama can’t ignore ya.

Rush, keep broadcasting on!

Rush, keep broadcasting on!

Oh, and one other thing I forgot to mention. According to Rush on his show on October First, Palin’s new book Going Rogue topped the lists at Amazon.com and Barnes & Nobles before even going to print. I’m not much for reading political books, but way to go Mrs. Maverick!

Posted in Humor, Music, Obama, Palin, Parody, Ridicule, Rush Limbaugh, Rush's Humor | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

obdaddy

Posted by guffyconservative on 10/05/2009

I left a couple of comments on a YouTube video of the Alan Grayson thing and got suckered into a debate with this guy obdaddy. So far, we’ve gone back and forth on waterboarding, torture, religion, the media, Rush, Crowder, Obama, liberalism, conservatism, and a good bit more. Essentially, he’s a bitter middle-aged man who can’t send a message or leave a comment without being condescending (concerning our age gap), insulting people (“tea baggers”), or something of the like.

It’s almost funny how he calls me a “zombie” and a “sheep” when he regurgitates (or at least appears to) stuff I’ve heard many, many times. Let’s just go through a quick rundown of some of what he’s said to me.

  • He really harped on Rush being a druggie, despite me trying to explain that Rush got hooked on what was originally necessary medicine (or as necessary as painkillers can be). He also consistently ignored the fact that Rush kicked the drug.
  • He told me to stop mindlessly listening to Hannity, Beck, and the like. I told him I’ve watched Hannity maybe three times and I’ve never even heard or watched Beck, or any of a number of other people he mentioned. He proceeded to call me a liar. To which I say, why would I lie about something like that? I told him I listen to Rush! Why wouldn’t I “admit” to listening to Beck or Hannity if I did? It makes no sense to me.
  • He said that waterboarding is torture because the waterboard-ee doesn’t know that it’s relatively harmless. So, apparently, we’re now allowing the ignorance (or lack thereof) of terrorists to dictate what we define as torture.
  • He accused me of being in a cult when I said I believe that the overwhelming majority of “Christians” are not Christians at all. However, I gave him specific Biblical reasons for this. He replied by saying that not everyone believes the Bible. To which I said that that doesn’t matter! Do you have to believe the Qur’an in order to use it to determine whether or not someone’s a Muslim? No.
  • He called pretty much every sort of media “snake oil salesman” (Rush, ESPN, liberal news, Disney, etc.), apparently because their motivation is selling adspace and stuff. I’ve asked him if he hates capitalism or something, but no response to that yet.
  • He says that I’m just a young idealist who’ll learn better as I grow. Does that ring just plain false with anyone else? Let’s see, the demographics show that a much bigger proportion of middle-aged people are conservative compared to the number of college students who are conservative. Seems to me that it is far more likely that my peers will grow to be conservatives, rather than us few conservatives growing to be liberals.
  • He essentially called liberalism the ideal of being benevolent, of helping society’s weak and claimed that conservatives construe health care for all as “evil.” I asked him what he, personally, does to help society’s weak and gave a few examples of what I’ve done, pointing out that liberals would actually have laws passed forcing others to care for society’s weak, rather than caring for them themselves. He hasn’t yet cited a single thing he’s done to care for the weak. He also told me not to try and pass off missionary work as anything other than condescending and rude. Someone’s got to explain that one to me.
  • He said Tea Partiers are racist and hateful but has yet to supply a single example (although I did ask). He claims he’s not calling me racist but says I “protest too much” when I gave him the short version of what’s in my letter to Janeane Garofalo.

Any thoughts?

Posted in Atheists, Christianity, Debates, FOX, Healthcare, Islam, Media Bias, obdaddy, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Spending, Tea Parties, Torture, Waterboarding | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

Obama’s Olympic Pitch

Posted by guffyconservative on 10/05/2009

Here’s a funny clip from The Rush Limbaugh Show on October First. Just a reminder – all these audio downloads are available in the Box.net widget in the sidebar.

Posted in Humor, Obama, Ridicule, Rush Limbaugh, Rush's Humor | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 349 other followers